Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Filip Peliwo vs Jake Van Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peliwo vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Filip Peliwo vs Jake Van Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peliwo 1 - 0 Emburgh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peliwo has won 50.8% of points on his second serve, while Emburgh has won 40.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peliwo, in recent form, has won 54.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 42.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.84% and 31.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peliwo has saved 57.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 40.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peliwo has won 56.34% of matches played (W/L 40/ 31), with Emburgh winning 48.94% (W/L 23/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peliwo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 92/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 51/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Peliwo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64% of matches (W/L 32/ 18), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peliwo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peliwo winning 2 and Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Peliwo and Emburgh was at the M15 Monastir, 10-04-2024, First, Hard with Filip Peliwo getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peliwo and Emburgh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peliwo winning 0 times and Emburgh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peliwo winning 0, and Emburgh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peliwo has played against opponents with an average rank of 138 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 107.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peliwo has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peliwo has converted 49.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peliwo 1 - 0 Emburgh
464
Rank
161
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
56% (398-309)
Career Total W/L
54% (73-63)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
21% (3-11)
$50,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Filip Peliwo | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (41/57) | 75% (52/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (29/41) | 58% (30/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 47% (8/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (31/69) | 32% (18/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Filip Peliwo | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 21% (3/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (24/20) | 21% (6/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (201/204) | 39% (112/174) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:47 | 1:20:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 177.43 | 96.93 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (756/1281) | 62% (427/689) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (488/756) | 59% (253/427) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (269/525) | 41% (107/262) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (57/118) | 43% (20/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (516/1255) | 36% (259/726) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 21% (3/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 21% (3/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Filip Peliwo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Filip Peliwo
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Filip Peliwo
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ali Habib
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Marcus Walters
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Amr Elsayed
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Seydina Andre
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Peliwo Vs Emburgh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
